Thursday, October 15, 2009

Vertigo



Vertigo is the perfect example of patriarchal cinema as defined by Laura Mulvey.

Firstly, it is a highly scopophilic movie in that the audience, the spectators derive immense pleasure from the act of watching. When Scottie is hired as the detective to watch over Madeleine, so begins our embrace of his identity. Soon we follow Madeleine everywhere, her figure and face is constantly at the center of our frame, the constant object that we watch intently. The camera cuts up her body—displaying each part with objective flatness—the flowers she holds, her platinum hair put into a bun, the back of her gray suit, her face displayed in perfected beauty. In essence, we allow ourselves to become perverted stalkers (not too different from Peeping Tom), seeing her as only parts of a whole—a physical being without personality traits that define her.



After Scottie meets Judy, he attempts to put these cut up pieces of Madeleine together again. He buys Judy Madeleine’s gray suit, forces her to dye her hair platinum blond, then tells her to put it up into Madeleine’s bun, assembling Madeleine together as if she were a doll or puppet or puzzle. Even when Judy tries to resist Scottie’s nagging, she is helpless to his influence. Therefore, allowing a woman to be looked at here, serves another purpose: it renders her helpless to the male gaze—Madeleine is literally constructed under the male gaze.

Vertigo is also a movie about castration, in that one of the dual plotlines is Scottie’s recovery from his feminine, helpless state. Mulvey argues in her article that the Policeman is a symbolic representation of all that is masculine. Therefore, the fact that the first scene shows the Policeman tumbling off the building and Scottie’s reaction of fear and acute sense of vertigo, establishes the psychological fear and trauma not of heights, but of castration.


Throughout the film, Scottie regains his manhood by stalking Madeleine—by submitting her to the male gaze. As Scottie discovers that Judy is actually Madeleine, he violently rebels against her—he rebels against the representation of the castrated man. In the scene in which Scottie is pushing Judy further and further up the stairs, Scottie is also conquering his fear of castration simultaneously with his fear of heights. It seems as if the more violent and vicious he is towards Judy, he gets further up the stairs, and he is closer to redeeming his manhood. The last scene in which Judy plummets off the building to her death is then symbolic of Scottie’s full redemption in that Judy, the image of the castrated man is banished forever.



Midge is the other image of the castrated man, a supposed Oedipal “mother figure” of the story. She serves an alternate purpose as a contrasting woman in the film. While Midge is always around Scottie, she is never subjected to his gaze (no matter how much she wants to be). In fact, his male gaze constantly ignores her.



In one scene, Midge shows Scottie a painting of herself as “Carlotta Valdes” from the art museum. This scene is extremely crucial in that Midge frames herself as Scottie’s object of desire—she attempts to force her gaze unto him! A painting, just like a film or a looking glass brings us out of one frame (the male gaze of the film) and into another alternate frame (the female gaze of the painting) and for this one scene, Midge has control over the gaze of the movie. Hitchcock almost seems to be making a joke when forcing us to look at the satirical painting and subjecting us temporarily to the female gaze, before Scottie turns away in disgust, suggesting that the female gaze ultimately fails.

Vertigo also functions as a text for the Film Noir genre. Both the film's syntax and semantics follow the genre traditionally. The contrasting shadows of the cinematography especially present in the scene in which Scottie and Madeleine walk into the forest, the dangerous beauty of Madeleine, and the darkened atmosphere that blends dream with reality are structural characteristics of Film Noir. In addition, Judy is treated as a woman who has the wrong morals--her beauty and significance as an object of desire brings about both Judy's and Scottie's downfall. In order to preserve the good, Judy dies in the end, preserving the "moral" man in Scottie. Film Noir in itself is a genre that is incredibly male--it regards beauty and women as something that will bring about the male down downfall--referring to the original downfall of man in which Eve "seduces" Adam in eating the fruit of knowledge, expelling them to earth.

Hitchcock uses the scopophilic male gaze, the rejection of the female gaze, the Freudian fear of castration, and the syntax and semantics of Film Noir to create a film that exploits the male fantasy.

9 comments:

  1. Great post, but I'm curious as to what your opinion is on Hitchcock's intent. It's very, very obvious that Hitchcock exploits the scopophilic male gaze for great effect in the film, bu do you feel that he does it for the purpose of actual exploitation, or perhaps to offer a commentary on the way men view women? It seems to me that Hitchcock makes these elements so obvious that he does so with the intent of making some sort of comment on them. He tends to consciously put obvious Freudian imagery in his films, and perhaps he is consciously commenting on the objectification of women too? I don't know, but it's an interesting thought I feel.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great summation Anne! Clear examples and descriptions were given. Vertigo follows mostly every point Mulvey was trying to make as you phrase it well- “the scopophilic male gaze, the rejection of the female gaze, the Freudian fear of castration, and the syntax and semantics of Film Noir to create a film that exploits the male fantasy.” Though Mulvey doesn’t emphasize Film Noir, she does talk about this male gaze in much detail. It’s interesting that a character like Midge is included in Vertigo as I’m still attempting to understand her purpose- why did Scottie reject her from his gaze? Is she trying to break the stereotype of the male gaze when she draws herself in that portrait, as she wants a female gaze perspective, but Hitchcock rejects it like you said? Or is she just simply not pretty enough or powerful enough for Scottie to fetish-ize or control? In response to Harry, I do think Hitchcock builds on Freud’s theory as a comment on the male gaze. His movies use Freudian concepts and agree with Mulveys comment that “unchallenged, mainstream film coded the erotic into the language of the dominant patriarchal order.”

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is such a good analysis. I really really really like this post. I hadn't thought about the female gaze and I'm really intrigued. Also, the castration aspect is really really true. I agree with everything you say in here, other than when at the beginning you say that the viewer derives intense pleasure from watching through the male gaze. I think that this gaze becomes more tainted as we go through the movie. It is something more beautifully rendered at first, but it is lost after Scotty's first encounter with Madeleine's death. It becomes more of a craving and more primal. It is as if James Stewart becomes a beast as he becomes more manly until the end. In the end, he kills her again, almost. I believe Plato might have called James Stewart a tyrant, the kind of ruler who is completely self-centered and forgoes all morality in order to be complete. The ruler only winds up broken and cold and heartless. I think he remains castrated at the end of the film. I think he probably would kill himself afterwards also, if the movie were to continue.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Madeleine is literally constructed under the male gaze. " You hit the nail on the head. This set of scenes made me sick. That Judy would let Scottie just tell her what to do really proves Mulvey's assertions true. Scottie's fetishes and gaze take over the whole movie and motivate all of his actions in dressing Judy.

    On another note, I love your analysis of Midge's painting and presentation of the painting. I was a little confused watching the movie our first time through, but I really think that your analysis is spot on. I did not realize that she really tries to make herself the object of his gaze, which is the same as '"throwing herself at him" in real life situations. I definitely agree with your analysis though, great job there.

    Great job, I'd be curious to hear your analysis on the significance of the bra on her desk like we discussed in class.

    ReplyDelete
  5. nice job, anne. It's fascinating to see how well Mulvey works with Hitchcock in this film and how Modeleski can argue against her with Rear Window. I too love how strange and complex Midge is as a character...

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Good job. It is a good analysis of Vertigo using Mulvey as a guide. I agree completely with the idea of Scottie being castrated at the beginning of the film. But I wonder why Hitchcock has him regain his masculinity by "submitting her to the male gaze"? This seems a very modern take on masculinity. Whereas in previous eras masculinity can be gained through violence or power it seems important that Hitchcock is making Scottie regain it through voyeurism. What does that say about our society? Perhaps Hitchcock is commenting on the fetishistic aspects of modern consumer society. I don't know, but it seems worth exploring...

    ReplyDelete
  8. I am not a fan of Freudian psychoanalysis in general, but your article certainly incorporates it in a very legitimate, thoughtful, objective way. I definitely enjoyed reading your presentation of Mulvey's argument, as well as your incorporation of and treatment on the psychological aspects of Hitchcock's films.

    Your mention of the story of Adam and Eve is particularly interesting. I actually have not thought to relate the Biblical conception of male/female relations to Mulvey nor to Hitchcock, but in retrospect, it seems remarkably appropriate. The female spectacle is the subject of desire and fantasy for the male protagonist, and in this function, has the potentiality of leading the male hero to his downfall, much like Eve allegedly did to Adam. Still, if we consider Mulvey with this Biblical story in mind, her argument would be a bit of an paradox. How can a woman be weak and subjugated before a man's gaze, and yet have the power to simultaneously bring him to downfall? That actually suggests an enormous amount of control and influence on the female's part. This relates to a point made in Modleski's article that in many cases, the female characters are empowered by male interest, not the other way around.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You raise some interesting points that I have not really thought about in depth in regards to Vertigo. First of all, I think that your opinion about our "embrace of his [Scottie's] identity" is really accurate. While watching the film, I was not consciously thinking about our readings (which raise this issue), but looking back, I realize that I was just as curious about Madeleine as Scottie was while following her. I found myself often times frustrated by how far away she was, and by the way that we did not see her from a straight on angle for awhile. I really really wanted to see her face close up-- like he was striving to do. I was not really curious about her story or her personality, to be honest. I had embraced Scottie's identity, and was thus more concerned about her beauty and aesthetic aura. I felt a strong sense of satisfaction in the scene at Scottie's place after he saves her from drowning, as I finally got to see Kim Novak in all her beauty. Another thing: I really like your analysis of the painting scene with Midge. I had not taken the time to really break down this scene into its elements, and I think your conclusion about the failure of the female gaze is really great.

    ReplyDelete